Like a prayer
Next fall the Supreme Court steps into a sea of casuistry when it hears a case involving public prayer
By S.M. | NEW YORK
DISPUTES about the contours of religious liberty in America are often marked by sanctimony, exaggerated offence, sloppy history, hyperbole and conceptual confusion, and then tend to be resolved with embarrassingly casuistic distinctions. In keeping with this tradition, a small-town conflict in upstate New York offers a fresh reminder of the jurisprudential price of religious freedom.
Town of Greece v Galloway, which the Supreme Court will consider in the fall (and which my colleague covers in this week's paper), asks whether local officials have been violating the constitution over the past 14 years by beginning town-board meetings with a prayer. Reversing the district court’s ruling, the second-circuit court decided last May that the prayers were unconstitutional. By inviting mostly Christian clergy to deliver the prayers, the town board had “impermissibly affiliated the town with a single creed, Christianity”.
More from Democracy in America
The fifth Democratic primary debate showed that a cull is overdue
Thinning out the field of Democrats could focus minds on the way to Iowa’s caucuses
The election for Kentucky’s governor will be a referendum on Donald Trump
Matt Bevin, the unpopular incumbent, hopes to survive a formidable challenge by aligning himself with the president
A state court blocks North Carolina’s Republican-friendly map
The gerrymandering fix could help Democrats keep the House in 2020