Democracy in America | Religious liberty and the Supreme Court

Endorsing the endorsement test

The Supreme Court should resist calls to abandon Justice O'Connor's understanding of what counts as "an establishment of religion"

By S.M. | NEW YORK

AMONG the many consequential cases to be heard by the Supreme Court this term isTown of Greece v Galloway, a clash over the meaning of the first-amendment rule that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”. Some believe the court should take this opportunity to reject the “no endorsement” interpretation of this provision first articulated in 1984 by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. In her concurring opinion in Lynch v Donnelly, Justice O’Connor agreed with four of her colleagues that the inclusion of a nativity scene in a public Christmas display does not violate the constitution, but her reasoning grew out of a novel approach to the provision:

More from Democracy in America

The fifth Democratic primary debate showed that a cull is overdue

Thinning out the field of Democrats could focus minds on the way to Iowa’s caucuses

The election for Kentucky’s governor will be a referendum on Donald Trump

Matt Bevin, the unpopular incumbent, hopes to survive a formidable challenge by aligning himself with the president


A state court blocks North Carolina’s Republican-friendly map

The gerrymandering fix could help Democrats keep the House in 2020