One of the first things the Ukrainian parliament did after the ouster of President Viktor Yanukovych last month was to repeal a law that allowed regional authorities to adopt Russian as a second official language after Ukrainian. The acting president understood the potential of the repeal to inflame tensions and vetoed the measure, but the moves highlight a larger question: what is the precise role of language in ethnic and national conflicts? Is language a driver of conflict, or is that merely a symptom of political and economic grievances?

Demonstrators wave flags and banners during a "March for Peace" rally opposing President Vladimir Putin and war in Ukraine, in Moscow, March 15, 2014.
Demonstrators wave flags and banners during a "March for Peace" rally opposing President Vladimir Putin and war in Ukraine, in Moscow, March 15, 2014. Photo Credit: The New York Times/Dmitry Kostyukov

Specialists discussed the link between language, linguistics, human rights and peacebuilding in the Symposium on Language, Peace and Security, held at USIP on Feb. 21, the date that marks UNESCO's International Mother Language Day. USIP’s Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding hosted the forum with SIL International, the Center for Applied Linguistics, and the Alliance for Peacebuilding.

Panelists offered especially interesting ideas about using language differences to bridge identity-based conflict in recent instances. One example came from participants Suwilai Presrirat and Unian Samoh of Mahidol University in Thailand, who discussed Patani Malay. That’s the primary spoken language of the ethnic group of the same name in the southernmost provinces of Thailand along the border with Malaysia.

Since the area came under Thai rule in the beginning of the twentieth century, tension has often arisen between the Patani Malay, who are Muslims, and the Buddhist majority in Thailand. Periods of fighting and opposition to the central government in Bangkok have been common, the latest being an armed insurgency that began 2004.

But the situation in southern Thailand is not clear-cut. As in many places where there is ethnic and linguistic diversity, people get along quite well most of the time, and there are hybrid or mixed identities. Indeed, Patani Malay is used as a lingua franca by ethnic Thai who live in the border region.

The Patani Malay dialect has traditionally not been a written language; when written communication was needed, people utilized an old form of Malay that used Arabic script. This is in contrast to the majority of Malay speakers in Malaysia and Indonesia, who use Latin script. A phonetic rendering of Patani Malay using the Thai alphabet was also introduced by the Thai government when it took control over the region.  

Many Patani Malay have consistently opposed the phonetic Thai version of the language, arguing that it would dilute the Patani Malay identity and culture and force those who speak that language to assimilate into the Thai majority.

In 2007, local educators initiated a bold program to bridge these linguistic differences. With Thai government support, a decision was made to use all three forms of the written language and not appear to be favoring one. The use of the Arabic script links to their traditions and history, the Latin script symbolizes the ties to Malays in neighboring countries, and the phonetic Thai script serves as a visual bridge with ethnic Thais in their own country. All three versions of the language are taught in schools and are used on public buildings.

The exact approach taken by the Patani Malay community is not a panacea, and this measure alone has not ended armed conflict in the south of Thailand. But it is an outstanding example of the kind of creative thinking that is essential for successful peacebuilding.

Indeed, this kind of reframing may further inspire new means to address deeply entrenched political and economic grievances. People have multiple identities in which they might find commonalities with their neighbors. But during conflict, especially when one of these identities becomes threatened or inflamed, people are more likely to focus on differences.

When there's too much division between primary identities, it is crucial to focus on secondary identities. Peacebuilders often work on a bridging identity, what is sometimes known as a third culture, to create or renew linkages between people. For example, a shared identity as mothers, or as grieving relatives, or as educational professionals, can be promoted to create dialogue between divided communities.

As participants in the Symposium on Language, Peace, and Security emphasized, the key is not for outsiders to try to impose a solution that bridges linguistic differences, but rather to bring motivated people together and help them find solutions that can be implemented in their communities.

For more information on ways for practitioners to work with local communities and find bridging solutions when there is identity-based conflict, see the following USIP Academy online course (currently offered at no charge): Engaging with Identity-Based Differences.

Peter Weinberger is a Senior Program Officer in USIP’s Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding.


Related Publications

In Russia’s Hybrid War on Europe, Moldova’s Critical Next 15 Months

In Russia’s Hybrid War on Europe, Moldova’s Critical Next 15 Months

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

A rising risk in southeast Europe is Russia’s sharpening of conflicts to block Moldova’s effort to join the European Union. The Kremlin is escalating a hybrid campaign to manipulate three Moldovan elections over the next 15 months. Moscow last week hosted the formation of a political bloc around its primary Moldovan ally, a fugitive billionaire convicted of the country’s worst-ever bank fraud — and sent a startling flood of pre-election cash that police seized at Moldova’s main airport. This is a critical season for Moldova’s democratic allies to help it defeat Russian disinformation and election subversion.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Ukraine’s New U.S. Lifeline: Why It’s Vital and What’s Next

Ukraine’s New U.S. Lifeline: Why It’s Vital and What’s Next

Thursday, April 25, 2024

This week’s U.S. approval of nearly $61 billion in funds for Ukraine’s defense is a lifeline in the Ukrainians’ struggle against Russia’s unprovoked invasion and the assault on peace and rule of law in Europe and beyond. Ukrainian troops have been rationing ammunition, their lack of defensive missiles has exposed Ukrainian cities to Russian aerial attacks — and many military analysts predicted a probable collapse on part of Ukraine’s eastern defensive lines. While this U.S. action boosts Ukrainians’ capacities and morale, ending this war will need further funds, forces and security measures for those fighting and suffering for their survival — and for the redemption of international peace through rule of law.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Whither NATO at 75?

Whither NATO at 75?

Thursday, April 11, 2024

NATO marked its 75th anniversary last week at a celebration in Brussels. While Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has injected the alliance with new life and resolve, the 32-member collective security pact is also wrestling with its future in a world of growing great power competition. In 2022, NATO formally identified for the first time China as a challenge to its interests and collective security. As NATO continues to support Ukraine and look to future global challenges, it also has internal issues to address, ranging from individual member defense spending to the problems posed by the need for collective decision-making among 32 members.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

View All Publications