Christian praying in southeastern Turkey
You've reached your limit of free articles.
To read the full story, start your free trial today.
Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.
Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban shaking hands.
Zoltan Fischer/Handout/ZUMA
Credibility question
The prioritization of these threats is largely — but not exclusively — a matter of geography and history. It would be tempting to say that further from Russia and closer to the Mediterranean, the more migration issues prevail. And that the Russian threat is a greater concern closer to Moscow.
This dichotomy does not take into account national specificities. In Eastern Europe, Viktor Orban's Hungary stands as a notable exception to the rule. Conversely, Giorgia Meloni's Italy, with a modernized and more "serious" far right, both on a geopolitical and economic level clearly addresses the question of the Russian threat. That is far from being the case of the National Rally (RN) party in France.
At a time when Russia — feeling time may play against it in Ukraine, with the planned arrival of U.S. weapons — is playing more than ever with the nuclear threat, a geopolitical theme should prevail. And it should lead Europeans to come up with simple answers to a simple question.
How can Europe respond in the most united and credible manner to Russian President Vladimir Putin's intimidation attempts? The more Russia threatens, and the more the U.S. hesitates, the more Europe there has to be, both qualitatively and, no doubt, quantitatively.
Russia's President Vladimir Putin and China's Vice President Han Zheng attend an exhibition as part of the 8th China-Russia Expo
Sergei Bobylev/TASS/ZUMA
More Europe
Exactly 20 years ago, EU enlargement to include previously communist countries in the east and center was — despite some very real difficulties — a resounding success. Today, to grow stronger and be united in freedom, Europe must prepare for a new enlargement that would increase its membership from 27 to 35.
Whatever the difficulties, sticking points, delays, contradictions, hesitations, the EU continues to act by capillarity, through the power of attraction it has always had on all those who dream of becoming a member.
The geopolitical issues are infinitely more dramatic for Europe now than they were 20 years ago.
The fact that the EU is “mortal,” as French President Emmanuel Macron rightly put it, does not make it any less attractive. Of course, Europe should not be delusional. This new enlargement will be even more difficult than the one carried out 20 years ago.
The integration of Ukraine, which represents the key and culmination point of this process, will be complicated, even if the Ukrainian economy is not so different today — according to studies by the Institute of international economy of Vienna — from the candidate countries back in 2004.
But above all, the geopolitical issues are infinitely more dramatic for Europe now than they were back then. Faced with Russia's ambitions, Europe's best response can be summed up in three words: firmness, unity and enlargement.
Reason vs. emotion
The problem is that this clear and rational vision is far having unanimous support. The Russian threat remains — despite Putin's considerable efforts — abstract for a majority of Europeans, who have no desire to die for Ukraine.
This threat, although very real, does not have as strong an impact as tragic domestic news items. It is natural that news of someone who is perceived as a radicalized alien carrying a weapon nearby is more frightening than the entire Russian military arsenal.
Solidarity with Ukraine is generally shared by a majority of Europeans. But how do we convey the idea that the best way to avoid war is not to yield to Moscow's blackmail? How can we explain to Europeans — at a time when the temptation to turn inward has never been greater — that a new “Big Bang” in terms of enlargement is necessary? And how do we do that quickly?
While the main threat comes from the east, it is mostly seen as coming from the south.
Europe's two major powers, France and Germany, are simultaneously confronted with the rise of populism — although the AfD (Alternative for Germany) is far from reaching the RN's scores in France.
While the main threat comes from the east, it is mostly seen as coming from the south. While it is above all political in nature (eastern despotism), it is mainly felt as religious (radical Islamism). I am well aware of the reality of the latter threat; the recent Belgian film "Amal: A Free Spirit” illustrates the devastating effects of Salafism in a Brussels high school.
The problem is that the fear of migration works much more clearly in favor of populist forces (the parties of emotion), than the Russian threat does for the parties of reason.
A dangerous shift in priorities.
From Your Site Articles
- "Our Europe Can Die": Macron Goes Full Alarmist On Existential Threat To The EU ›
- Why The Polish Election Results Are Such Good News For Ukraine ›
- Erdogan III & Europe: Is There Any Future For Turkey In The EU? ›
Related Articles Around the Web
