Europe | Ukraine’s war

The fire that did not cease

The fall of Debaltseve underlines the cynicism of the Minsk ceasefire

Victory into defeat
|KIEV

THE latest peace plan never had much chance. Shortly after signing it in Minsk, rebel leaders declared that Debaltseve, where several thousand Ukrainian troops were located, fell outside its terms. After the “ceasefire” started on February 15th, they continued their assault. By February 18th the flag of Novorossiya, the rebels’ pseudo-state, had been raised over the city centre. “It’s always tough to lose,” quipped Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin. Ukraine’s president, Petro Poroshenko, ordered a risky retreat and tried to paint the defeat as a victory, saying his troops’ swift escape had put Russia “to shame”.

Such spin fell on deaf ears inside Ukraine. Photos of muddied troops who had fled on foot belied claims of an “organised” operation. Soldiers told of a night-time journey across frozen fields, punctuated by ambushes and casualties. The Ukrainian government claims regular Russian troops backed the rebels. Douglas Lute, America’s ambassador to NATO, says that teams of specialised Russians, mostly Spetsnaz elite troops, are operating command-and-control systems and the most sophisticated weapons. These troops form “a sort of parallel command structure answerable to Moscow,” he says.

This article appeared in the Europe section of the print edition under the headline "The fire that did not cease"

India’s chance to fly

From the February 21st 2015 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Europe

A fresh Russian push will test Ukraine severely, says a senior general

An interview with Vadym Skibitsky, deputy head of Ukraine’s military intelligence

Europeans lack visceral attachment to the EU. Does it matter?

In search of the missing European demos


Donald Tusk mulls which of the previous government’s plans to axe

The Polish populists’ projects were often preposterous, but not always